The Consumer Protection Act is very clear that no agreement may contain any unreasonable clauses. Therefore, should a lease agreement contain an unreasonable clause as one of the examples mentioned above, the entire agreement is at risk of being disregarded. Further to this, clauses like this would merely be disregarded when a dispute should arise relating to the agreement. Therefore any action taken based on a clause such as this would still not fall within the allowed legal perimeters. These clauses create a false sense of security for the lessor and would create the perception that unlawful actions will be allowed.
To have a reasonable lease protecting both the lessor and lessee might not seem as attractive to a lessor, but will be enforceable, and as such have the desired results. Placing a tenant in a property with a valid, enforceable and well drafted lease agreement will lead to successful property investment in the overt majority of circumstances. Concurrently, an enforceable lease agreement and its provisions have the added benefit, that when an attorney has to attend to an eviction or summons, she can proceed unhindered. This will lead to less frustration as well as shorter and more effective litigation. Inherently, if you study the pros and cons, the valid lease agreement is the only option.
Be rental-smart, get the right answers and as always #happyrenting.
The effect of a sale on a management mandate agreement Is the purchaser of a property with a tenant in the premises duty-bound to perform in terms of the former landlord’s obligations towards the lease agreement, or in terms of a mandate in the case of a management mandate agreement? The lease agreement remains in […]
Obtaining court dates from the High Courts in Lockdown Level 1 As much as we, as legal practitioners, have got used to attending to court virtually and working with the new online court system, called CaseLines; the legal profession is still experiencing extreme difficulties. The latest court directives allow us to issue new proceedings at […]
Does Section 4(5)(c) of the Rental Housing Act contradict the principle of huur gaat voor koop? The legal principle of huur gaat voor koop was established within Roman Dutch Law and has, since the adoption of Roman Dutch Law as the foundation of the South African legal system, been one of the cornerstone principles governing property […]
Why were these regulations declared unconstitutional by the High Court? What does this mean? On 2 June 2020 the High Court handed down a judgement in the matter of De Beer v COTGA. News of this judgement spread in the media and on social media like wildfire, with headings like “Lockdown Regulations Unconstitutional”; as much […]
LEVEL 4 REGULATIONS ON EVICTIONS The Alert Level 4 Regulations were released to the public explaining exactly what Level 4 will entail for the South African public. One of the regulations, specifically Regulation 19, deals with the prohibition of evictions and has a big effect on our property industry. The Regulation reads as follows: A […]
No regulations of any kind have been implemented to authorise tenants to refrain from paying rent. The global pandemic brought about by the COVID-19 virus has thrust South Africa into one of the most unfamiliar and uncertain times in our history, the likes of which never before experienced. Government has, in response to the virus, […]