So how do we deal with early cancellation by a tenant? As always, an answer in law can never be a one-size-fits-all answer. In this regard, we are happy to report that there is at least one set rule; a landlord would never have to suffer damages as a result of a tenant’s early cancellation of the lease agreement. One of the things that has to be considered in determining which damages the landlord can claim from the tenant is, if there is any specific legislation applicable to the lease agreement.
Section 14 of The Consumer Protection Act (CPA) makes provision for a consumer, in a fixed term agreement, to terminate such agreement by giving the supplier 20 business days’ notice of cancellation. This would mean that a tenant in a fixed term lease can cancel that lease agreement by giving the landlords the notice as referred to in the CPA. The majority of residential lease agreements will be governed by section 14 of the CPA. There are some exclusions though, for instance when the parties are juristic persons. In these cases, Section 14 only makes provision for a reasonable cancellation penalty that the landlord would be allowed to claim from the tenant.
Great confusion was caused by the perception that the tenant can cancel the agreement without any consequence. This is not the case as the tenant remains liable for the actual damages suffered due to the cancellation of the lease agreement. These damages will include loss of income for the period the landlord did not have a tenant, agent commission paid by the landlord and damage to the property. It is however of paramount importance that the lessor has a duty to mitigate his damages and will have to take positive action to secure a new tenant as soon as possible.
In lease agreements, where section 14 of the CPA does not apply, the position would be exactly the same, the landlord would only be able to claim the actual damages suffered. This is, however not governed by the CPA, but by the Conventional Penalties Act.
The effect of a sale on a management mandate agreement Is the purchaser of a property with a tenant in the premises duty-bound to perform in terms of the former landlord’s obligations towards the lease agreement, or in terms of a mandate in the case of a management mandate agreement? The lease agreement remains in […]
Obtaining court dates from the High Courts in Lockdown Level 1 As much as we, as legal practitioners, have got used to attending to court virtually and working with the new online court system, called CaseLines; the legal profession is still experiencing extreme difficulties. The latest court directives allow us to issue new proceedings at […]
Does Section 4(5)(c) of the Rental Housing Act contradict the principle of huur gaat voor koop? The legal principle of huur gaat voor koop was established within Roman Dutch Law and has, since the adoption of Roman Dutch Law as the foundation of the South African legal system, been one of the cornerstone principles governing property […]
Why were these regulations declared unconstitutional by the High Court? What does this mean? On 2 June 2020 the High Court handed down a judgement in the matter of De Beer v COTGA. News of this judgement spread in the media and on social media like wildfire, with headings like “Lockdown Regulations Unconstitutional”; as much […]
LEVEL 4 REGULATIONS ON EVICTIONS The Alert Level 4 Regulations were released to the public explaining exactly what Level 4 will entail for the South African public. One of the regulations, specifically Regulation 19, deals with the prohibition of evictions and has a big effect on our property industry. The Regulation reads as follows: A […]
No regulations of any kind have been implemented to authorise tenants to refrain from paying rent. The global pandemic brought about by the COVID-19 virus has thrust South Africa into one of the most unfamiliar and uncertain times in our history, the likes of which never before experienced. Government has, in response to the virus, […]