It is possible that an eviction application may have to be instituted during the process of transferring a property. We usually encounter this conundrum in two different instances:
When a Property is bought and sold on a sale in execution; and
In cases where a tenant of the seller or the seller himself refuse to vacate the property at the time of transfer or at the time that occupation is granted in terms of the provisions of the Offer to Purchase (OTP).
We will delve deeper into the two situations above and explain the best options regarding initiation of eviction proceedings.
Property bought and sold in a sale in execution:
It is standard practice for the Conditions of Sale in a sale in execution to contain a clause giving the right of occupation to the purchaser on the “fall of the hammer”. The problem hiding behind such a clause, is that this right of occupation does not give the purchaser the right to institute eviction proceeding before the property is registered in his/her name. To recap; the right of ownership is required in order to establish a right to initiate eviction proceedings. The solution to this problem, we suggest, is that the attorney mandated to effect the eviction application, should also be appointed as the conveyancer for the transfer of the property. The reason this solution is the best option is that this places the mandated attorneys in a position to prepare all necessary eviction documentation and initiate the eviction proceedings on the day right after registration of the property in the name of the purchaser. In this way, it cancels out the problematic situations where the eviction application is instituted prematurely; which will lead to the new owner not having the required right to bring the eviction application (locus standi), or too late: which will lead to an unnecessary delay in removal of the occupant.
Tenant of the seller or the seller himself refuses to vacate the property at the time of transfer:
Where the seller refuses to vacate the property it would now be apparent that eviction proceedings can only be initiated after transfer of the property into the name of the purchaser. The owner can obviously not institute eviction proceedings against himself. It would also be advisable to start the formal procedure as soon as registration has taken place, provided that the offer to purchase does not allow the seller an extended right of occupation.
Where the seller has a tenant in the property and for some reason, the lease agreement has been cancelled or terminated by the effluxion of time; the situation could arise where the seller frantically wants the tenant evicted prior to registration of the property. This would benefit the purchaser greatly in that he would not be burdened with legal costs to institute the same process. In a situation like this it is crucial to note that should the eviction proceedings be initiated by the seller, as the applicant, and the property is transferred into the name of the purchaser before the eviction order has been handed down, the seller loses her locus standi. Only on transfer, will the purchaser become the owner and have the right to initiate eviction proceedings. As previously mentioned, a quick solution to the problem would be to have the mandated eviction attorneys as the conveyancing attorneys. It would further be advisable to initiate eviction proceedings as soon as possible before the transfer since an eviction can be finalised in the same or slightly more time than it would take to complete the transfer.
During this time the offer to purchase would regulate the occupational rent aspect of the sale. In the typical situation the right of occupation will transfer to the purchaser on transfer and for this reason, should the eviction take longer to finalise than the transfer, the seller could be held liable for occupational rent payable to the purchaser since it is his duty to give vacant occupation of the property to the purchaser.
The seller would usually be required to provide vacant occupation, for this reason in the majority of the cases the seller would be liable to initiate eviction proceedings and accordingly fit the bill for the legal costs. Unless, the OTP specifically contain a different agreement between the parties.
The effect of a sale on a management mandate agreement Is the purchaser of a property with a tenant in the premises duty-bound to perform in terms of the former landlord’s obligations towards the lease agreement, or in terms of a mandate in the case of a management mandate agreement? The lease agreement remains in […]
Obtaining court dates from the High Courts in Lockdown Level 1 As much as we, as legal practitioners, have got used to attending to court virtually and working with the new online court system, called CaseLines; the legal profession is still experiencing extreme difficulties. The latest court directives allow us to issue new proceedings at […]
Does Section 4(5)(c) of the Rental Housing Act contradict the principle of huur gaat voor koop? The legal principle of huur gaat voor koop was established within Roman Dutch Law and has, since the adoption of Roman Dutch Law as the foundation of the South African legal system, been one of the cornerstone principles governing property […]
Why were these regulations declared unconstitutional by the High Court? What does this mean? On 2 June 2020 the High Court handed down a judgement in the matter of De Beer v COTGA. News of this judgement spread in the media and on social media like wildfire, with headings like “Lockdown Regulations Unconstitutional”; as much […]
LEVEL 4 REGULATIONS ON EVICTIONS The Alert Level 4 Regulations were released to the public explaining exactly what Level 4 will entail for the South African public. One of the regulations, specifically Regulation 19, deals with the prohibition of evictions and has a big effect on our property industry. The Regulation reads as follows: A […]
No regulations of any kind have been implemented to authorise tenants to refrain from paying rent. The global pandemic brought about by the COVID-19 virus has thrust South Africa into one of the most unfamiliar and uncertain times in our history, the likes of which never before experienced. Government has, in response to the virus, […]