Fair wear and tear can be defined as the natural deterioration of a building over time without any accidental or malicious damage. Damage to the property caused by a tenant would be for instance drawings on walls by children or items that was stuck to walls with double sided tape, glue or any other form of material to attach items to a wall or burns or stains to carpets. This will always exclude the normal damage to a carpet due to normal use for instance walking on a carpet which would cause a form of damage to the carpet where you can see which part of the carpet is walked on more often.
The exterior of a premises usually suffers normal fair wear and tear at a greater speed than the interior, as the building is exposed to the elements, for instance the paint on the roof and the outside of the building which is not face brick are exposed to sun and rain. The maintenance of paint and regular repainting of the premises, repainting of the roof and repairs to the gutters which was caused by rain and rust is defined as fair wear and tear.
An easy test for fair wear and tear is, would this happen in the premises if you occupied the premises, even if you took reasonable care of the premises, so is this typically just damage to a property that will occur in time.
The effect of a sale on a management mandate agreement Is the purchaser of a property with a tenant in the premises duty-bound to perform in terms of the former landlord’s obligations towards the lease agreement, or in terms of a mandate in the case of a management mandate agreement? The lease agreement remains in […]
Obtaining court dates from the High Courts in Lockdown Level 1 As much as we, as legal practitioners, have got used to attending to court virtually and working with the new online court system, called CaseLines; the legal profession is still experiencing extreme difficulties. The latest court directives allow us to issue new proceedings at […]
Does Section 4(5)(c) of the Rental Housing Act contradict the principle of huur gaat voor koop? The legal principle of huur gaat voor koop was established within Roman Dutch Law and has, since the adoption of Roman Dutch Law as the foundation of the South African legal system, been one of the cornerstone principles governing property […]
Why were these regulations declared unconstitutional by the High Court? What does this mean? On 2 June 2020 the High Court handed down a judgement in the matter of De Beer v COTGA. News of this judgement spread in the media and on social media like wildfire, with headings like “Lockdown Regulations Unconstitutional”; as much […]
LEVEL 4 REGULATIONS ON EVICTIONS The Alert Level 4 Regulations were released to the public explaining exactly what Level 4 will entail for the South African public. One of the regulations, specifically Regulation 19, deals with the prohibition of evictions and has a big effect on our property industry. The Regulation reads as follows: A […]
No regulations of any kind have been implemented to authorise tenants to refrain from paying rent. The global pandemic brought about by the COVID-19 virus has thrust South Africa into one of the most unfamiliar and uncertain times in our history, the likes of which never before experienced. Government has, in response to the virus, […]