You’re probably asking yourself why you’re the one being issued with a fine when you are all the way in Greece keeping out of trouble. This is where we need to draw the important distinction between the ‘owner-body corporate’ relationship and the ‘landlord-tenant’ relationship. This is due to the fact that, at present, no legal relationship actually exists between the tenant and the body corporate. In terms of section 35(4) of the Sectional Titles Act No. 95 of 1986 (the “Act”) and Prescribed Management Rule (PMR) 69, you as the owner of the unit is directly liable to the body corporate for the conduct of your tenants as it is the duty of the owner to ensure compliance with the rules by tenants and occupants, including employees, guests and all members of his family. What recourse, if any, would you, as the landlord have against Mr Lee with regards to the fine imposed? Thankfully, owners are protected in terms of section 5(8) of the Rental Housing Act Act (50 of 1999) (the “RHA”) which stipulates that a copy of the conduct rules (more commonly and incorrectly known as “house rules”) must be attached to the lease agreement. Should this provision be complied with, you as the landlord, will be in a position to hold Mr Lee liable for the fine imposed as well as the associated damage caused by his hell-raising children. The recovery of the fine imposed by the body corporate will depend on the provisions of the lease agreement, which should provide for such recovery.
Let’s assume that you were too busy planning your holiday to care about attaching conduct rules to the agreement, is Mr Lee now released of all liability? In terms of PMR 69, the rules of the body corporate, being the management and conduct rules filed at the relevant Deeds Registry, apply to you as the owner as well as to all other occupants of the unit. Even though the body corporate is entitled to hold you, as the owner directly liable for the damage caused to the property, you can enforce these rules against Mr Lee. Therefore, if the rules of the body corporate, filed with the Registrar permit for a fine to be issued for damages, you have a right to seek relief against Mr Lee.
What happens when Mr Lee refuses to pay the fine because his little angels weren’t the only ones causing the damages – or even better, he argues that he was not given a first warning and that the issuing of the fine was therefore premature. In this case, it becomes important to note and discuss the nature of the applicable conduct rules with the tenant. What most people don’t realise is that the rules must be filed with the Deeds Registrar, in order for them to be enforceable. If the body-corporate drops the ball on filing the rules, not to worry, the conduct rules in Annexure 9 of the Act automatically become applicable. Unfortunately, Annexure 9 does not provide for the administration of a fine as a form of sanction as this is a very specific and limiting deterrent. Therefore, the best way to ensure that a fine could be imposed, would be if the rules specifically stipulate that a fine be issued in that particular situation.
In such a case, you have yet another trick up your sleeve – section 5(3)(p) of the RHA stipulates that a tenant will be liable towards the landlord for any costs in relation to a lease agreement upon the landlord’s proof of expenditure. So, as long as your record-keeping skills are down to a “T” and you have documentary proof of the damages and costs incurred, good old Mr Lee can be held liable for the damage caused by his children.
You can therefore rest assured on your well-deserved holiday in Greece. Just because Mr Lee is not directly liable to the body-corporate itself, does not mean that he and his family members are automatically absolved from liability. Even though you have well-drafted legislation at your disposal as a safety net, proper administration and record-keeping is essential. Always stay on the safe side and take the time to attach conduct rules to the lease agreement and go through the rules with the tenant to ensure that he understands the content and the consequences of any non-compliance – this will definitely make for an easier paper trail to follow.
The effect of a sale on a management mandate agreement Is the purchaser of a property with a tenant in the premises duty-bound to perform in terms of the former landlord’s obligations towards the lease agreement, or in terms of a mandate in the case of a management mandate agreement? The lease agreement remains in […]
Obtaining court dates from the High Courts in Lockdown Level 1 As much as we, as legal practitioners, have got used to attending to court virtually and working with the new online court system, called CaseLines; the legal profession is still experiencing extreme difficulties. The latest court directives allow us to issue new proceedings at […]
Does Section 4(5)(c) of the Rental Housing Act contradict the principle of huur gaat voor koop? The legal principle of huur gaat voor koop was established within Roman Dutch Law and has, since the adoption of Roman Dutch Law as the foundation of the South African legal system, been one of the cornerstone principles governing property […]
Why were these regulations declared unconstitutional by the High Court? What does this mean? On 2 June 2020 the High Court handed down a judgement in the matter of De Beer v COTGA. News of this judgement spread in the media and on social media like wildfire, with headings like “Lockdown Regulations Unconstitutional”; as much […]
LEVEL 4 REGULATIONS ON EVICTIONS The Alert Level 4 Regulations were released to the public explaining exactly what Level 4 will entail for the South African public. One of the regulations, specifically Regulation 19, deals with the prohibition of evictions and has a big effect on our property industry. The Regulation reads as follows: A […]
No regulations of any kind have been implemented to authorise tenants to refrain from paying rent. The global pandemic brought about by the COVID-19 virus has thrust South Africa into one of the most unfamiliar and uncertain times in our history, the likes of which never before experienced. Government has, in response to the virus, […]